Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):356-356 (2006)

Abstract
Mesoudi et al.'s case can be improved by expanding to compelling selectionist explanations elsewhere in the social sciences and by seeing that natural selection is an instance of general selectionist process. Obstacles include the common use of extreme idealizations and optimality evidence, the copresence of nonselectionist social processes, and the fact that selectionist explanations often presuppose other kinds of social explanations. (Published Online November 9 2006).
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x06329081
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,241
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Early State and Democracy.Leonid Grinin - 2004 - In Leonid Grinin, Robert Carneiro, Dmitri Bondarenko, Nikolay Kradin & Andrey Korotayev (eds.), The Early State, Its Alternatives and Analogues. ‘Uchitel’ Publishing House. pp. 419--463.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Intentionalistic Explanations in the Social Sciences.John R. Searle - 1991 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (3):332-344.
Towards a Unified Science of Cultural Evolution.Alex Mesoudi, Andrew Whiten & Kevin N. Laland - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):329-347.
Pluralism and Panselectionism.John Beatty - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:113 - 128.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
23 ( #423,001 of 2,325,132 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #671,788 of 2,325,132 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes