Frits Went’s Atomic Age Greenhouse: The Changing Labscape on the Lab-Field Border [Book Review]
Journal of the History of Biology 42 (2):289 - 324 (2009)
Abstract
In Landscapes and Labscapes Robert Kohler emphasized the separation between laboratory and field cultures and the creation of new "hybrid" or mixed practices as field sciences matured in the early twentieth century. This article explores related changes in laboratory practices, especially novel designs for the analysis of organism-environment relations in the mid-twentieth century. American ecologist Victor Shelford argued in 1929 that technological improvements and indoor climate control should be applied to ecological laboratories, but his recommendations were too ambitious for the time. In the postwar period Frits W. Went, plant physiologist at the California Institute of Technology, created a new high-tech laboratory, dubbed a "phytotron", in the hope that it would transform plant sciences by allowing for unprecedented control of environmental variables. Went's aspirations, the research conducted in his laboratory, and its impact in initiating an international movement, are considered. Went's laboratory can be seen as a "hybrid culture" evolving in the laboratory, complementing and intersecting with some of the field practices that Kohler describes. It was also a countercultural movement against the reductionist trends of molecular biology in the 1950s and 1960s. By considering the history of the laboratory in relation to field sciences, we can explore how new funding sources and cross-disciplinary relations affected the development of field sciences, especially in the postwar period.DOI
10.1007/s10739-009-9179-y
My notes
Similar books and articles
Place, Practice and Primatology: Clarence Ray Carpenter, Primate Communication and the Development of Field Methodology, 1931–1945. [REVIEW]Georgina M. Montgomery - 2005 - Journal of the History of Biology 38 (3):495 - 533.
Robert E. Kohler, Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab–Field Border in Biology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2002. [REVIEW]Peder Anker - 2003 - Metascience 12 (3):401-404.
What is it like to be a geologist? A phenomenology of geology and its epistemological implications.Thomas Raab & Robert Frodeman - 2002 - Philosophy and Geography 5 (1):69 – 81.
Natural history and the clinic: The regional ecology of allergy in America.G. Mitman - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (3):491-510.
The birth of EMBO and the difficult road to EMBL.John Krige - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (3):547-564.
Laboratory versus field research in psychology and the social sciences.Virginia Black - 1955 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5 (20):319-330.
Cooperation in and out of the lab: a comment on Binmore’s paper. [REVIEW]Francesco Guala - 2010 - Mind and Society 9 (2):159-169.
Cooperativeness and impatience in the tragedy of the commons.Ernst Fehr & Andreas Leibbrandt - unknown
Reconstructing life. Molecular biology in postwar Britain.S. Chadarevian - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (3):431-448.
Ethology, Natural History, the Life Sciences, and the Problem of Place.Richard W. Burkhardt - 1999 - Journal of the History of Biology 32 (3):489 - 508.
Degradation, transformation and metabolism of 14c-labelled cyfluthrin (baythroid) in soil-plant system under laboratory and field conditions.Asma Lodhi - unknown
An affordance field for guiding movement and cognition.Arthur M. Glenberg, Monica R. Cowart & Michael P. Kaschak - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):43-44.
'Equal though different': Laboratories, museums and the institutional development of biology in late-Victorian northern England.A. Kraft & M. M. - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (2):203-236.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-05-29
Downloads
22 (#522,476)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2011-05-29
Downloads
22 (#522,476)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Working across species down on the farm: Howard S. Liddell and the development of comparative psychopathology, c. 1923–1962.Robert G. W. Kirk & Edmund Ramsden - 2018 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (1):24.
The organism strikes back: Chlorella algae and their impact on photosynthesis research, 1920s–1960s.Kärin Nickelsen - 2017 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 39 (2).
Demarcating Nature, Defining Ecology: Creating a Rationale for the Study of Nature’s “Primitive Conditions”.S. Andrew Inkpen - 2017 - Perspectives on Science 25 (3):355-392.
Labs in the Field? Rocky Mountain Biological Stations in the Early Twentieth Century.Jeremy Vetter - 2012 - Journal of the History of Biology 45 (4):587 - 611.
The instability of field experiments: building an experimental research tradition on the rocky seashores.Jean-Baptiste Grodwohl, Franco Porto & Charbel N. El-Hani - 2018 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (3):45.
References found in this work
Experimentalists and Naturalists in Twentieth-Century Botany: Experimental Taxonomy, 1920-1950. [REVIEW]Joel B. Hagen - 1984 - Journal of the History of Biology 17 (2):249 - 270.
Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology.Robert E. Kohler - 2003 - Journal of the History of Biology 36 (3):599-601.
Fruits and Plains. The Horticultural Transformation of America.Philip J. Pauly - 2008 - Journal of the History of Biology 41 (4):771-773.
Ecologists and Environmental Politics: A History of Contemporary Ecology.Stephen Bocking - 1998 - Journal of the History of Biology 31 (1):145-147.
Shaping Biology: The National Science Foundation and American Biological Research, 1945-1975.Toby A. Appel - 2001 - Journal of the History of Biology 34 (2):415-418.