Learning and selection

Biology and Philosophy 23 (4):493-507 (2008)

Authors
Justine Kingsbury
University of Waikato
Abstract
Are learning processes selection processes? This paper takes a slightly modified version of the account of selection presented in Hull et al. (Behav Brain Sci 24:511–527, 2001) and asks whether it applies to learning processes. The answer is that although some learning processes are selectional, many are not. This has consequences for teleological theories of mental content. According to these theories, mental states have content in virtue of having proper functions, and they have proper functions in virtue of being the products of selection processes. For some mental states, it is plausible that the relevant selection process is natural selection, but there are many for which it is not plausible. One response to this (due to David Papineau) is to suggest that the learning processes by which we acquire non-innate mental states are selection processes and can therefore confer proper functions on mental states. This paper considers two ways in which this response could be elaborated, and argues that neither of them succeed: the teleosemanticist cannot rely on the claim that learning processes are selection processes in order to justify the attribution of proper functions to beliefs.
Keywords Philosophy   Evolutionary Biology   Philosophy of Biology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10539-008-9113-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,148
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Representation in Cognitive Science.Nicholas Shea - 2018 - Oxford University Press.
A Generalized Selected Effects Theory of Function.Justin Garson - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (3):523-543.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A More Pluralist Typology of Selection Processes.Bence Nanay - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):547-548.
Natural Selection and Metaphors of “Selection”.Adolf Heschl - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):539-540.
The Role of Information and Replication in Selection Processes.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):538-538.
Multiply Concurrent Replication.David L. Hull & Sigrid S. Glenn - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):902-904.
At Last: Serious Consideration.David L. Hull, Rodney E. Langman & Sigrid S. Glenn - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):559-569.
Selection: Information and Replication of the Operant.Ralph Spiga - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):556-557.
Selection in Operant Learning May Fit a General Model.Julian C. Leslie - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):542-543.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
76 ( #114,851 of 2,285,431 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #55,737 of 2,285,431 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature