Phenomenology, idealism, and the legacy of Kant


Authors
James Kinkaid
Boston University
Abstract
Martin Heidegger closes his Winter Semester 1927–28 lectures by claiming that Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, read through the lens of Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology, confirmed the accuracy of his philosophical path culminating in Being and Time. A notable interpretation of Heidegger’s debt to Kant, advanced by William Blattner, presents Heidegger as a temporal idealist. I argue that attention to Husserl’s adaptation of Kant’s critical philosophy shows that both Husserl and Heidegger are realists. I make my case by tracing a unified philosophical problematic through three puzzling passages: the Schematism chapter of the first Critique, Husserl’s thought experiment of the destruction of the world in Ideas, and the passage in Being and Time that motivates Blattner’s idealist reading. Husserl and Heidegger give accounts, derived from Kant, of how the consciousness of time makes it possible for objects to be perceived as enduring unities, as well as ‘genealogies of logic’ that show how a priori knowledge, including ontology, is possible. These accounts are idealistic only in the sense that they concern the ideal or essential features of intentionality in virtue of which it puts us in touch with things as they are independently of the contributions of any mind of any type.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/09608788.2018.1526166
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,796
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.Gideon Rosen - 2010 - In Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 109-36.
Critique of Pure Reason.I. KANT - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant's Idealism: The Current Debate.Dennis Schulting - 2010 - In Dennis Schulting Jacco Verburgt (ed.), Kant's Idealism. Springer.
The Location of Kant's Refutation of Idealism.Robert Watt - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):1640-1659.
Critical Idealism in the Eyes of Kant's Contemporaries.Brigitte Sassen - 1997 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (3):421-455.
Who's Afraid of Idealism?Luis M. Augusto - 2005 - University Press of America.
Kant and Phenomenology.Tom Rockmore - 2011 - University of Chicago Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-10-30

Total views
32 ( #253,485 of 2,244,030 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #199,908 of 2,244,030 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature