Perceptions of intentional wrongdoing and Peer reporting behavior among registered nurses
Journal of Business Ethics 34 (1):1 - 13 (2001)
Abstract
How a person perceives a wrongdoing being committed by a coworker will affect whether the incident is reported within the organization. A significant factor that may influence the decision to report a wrongdoing is the perceived intentionality of the wrongdoer. This study sought to examine if differences in perceptions of a wrongdoing could affect the disclosure of unethical behavior. Three hundred seventy-two registered nurses responded to a survey consisting of both intentional and unintentional wrongdoings that could occur by a nurse. Results of a paired t-test were as predicted. More wide ranging revelations found that respondents were more likely to discuss the unintentional wrongdoings with the wrongdoer in lieu of officially reporting to an immediate supervisor, or a member of upper management. Discussion, limitations, and suggestions for future research are provided.Reprint years
2004
DOI
10.1023/a:1011915215302
My notes
Similar books and articles
Estimating the incidence of wrongdoing and whistle-blowing: Results of a study using randomized response technique. [REVIEW]Brian K. Burton & Janet P. Near - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (1):17 - 30.
Religiosity, ethical ideology, and intentions to report a Peer's wrongdoing.Tim Barnett, Ken Bass & Gene Brown - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (11):1161 - 1174.
The implications of an organization's structure on whistleblowing.Granville King - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 20 (4):315-326.
Peer reporting of unethical behavior: The influence of justice evaluations and social context factors. [REVIEW]Bart Victor, Linda Klebe Trevino & Debra L. Shapiro - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (4):253 - 263.
Ethical codes of conduct and organizational context: A study of the relationship between codes of conduct, employee behavior and organizational values. [REVIEW]Mark John Somers - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 30 (2):185-195.
Value Orientations as Determinants of Preference for External and Anonymous Whistleblowing.Dilek Zamantili Nayir & Christian Herzig - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2):197-213.
Financial accountants' perceptions of management's ethical standards.Jill M. D'Aquila - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 31 (3):233 - 244.
Wrongdoing by consultants: An examination of employees' reporting intentions. [REVIEW]Susan Ayers & Steven E. Kaplan - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 57 (2):121 - 137.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
22 (#522,916)
6 months
1 (#455,921)
2009-01-28
Downloads
22 (#522,916)
6 months
1 (#455,921)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
From Inaction to External Whistleblowing: The Influence of the Ethical Culture of Organizations on Employee Responses to Observed Wrongdoing. [REVIEW]Muel Kaptein - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 98 (3):513 - 530.
Impact of Emotional Intelligence, Ethical Climate, and Behavior of Peers on Ethical Behavior of Nurses.Satish P. Deshpande & Jacob Joseph - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):403-410.
How Much You See Is How You Respond: The Curvilinear Relationship Between the Frequency of Observed Unethical Behavior and The Whistleblowing Intention.Muel Kaptein - 2022 - Journal of Business Ethics 175 (4):857-875.
Beyond silence or compliance: The complexities of reporting a friend for misconduct.Megan F. Hess, Linda K. Treviño, Anjier Chen & Rob Cross - 2019 - Business Ethics: A European Review 28 (4):546-562.
The Impact of Relative Position and Relational Closeness on the Reporting of Unethical Acts.Diane L. Miller & Stuart Thomas - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 61 (4):315-328.