Scotus's rejection of Anselm

Abstract
stance, Scotus adopts Anselm’s notion of a ‘(pure) perfection’ and elevates it to a fundamental principle of his metaphysics. Again, he distills Anselm’s Ontological Argument into something like its original Monologion components, and then treats each component part of the argument with a rigor and attention to detail far beyond anything Anselm suggested. In the case of Anselm’s so-called ‘two-wills’ theory, however, Scotus’s revisions are so extensive that they amount to a rejection of Anselm’s account, even though Scotus retains some of Anselm’s terminology. I’ll begin by looking at Anselm’s initial presentation of the two-wills theory in his De casu diaboli (§1), and his later refinements of that account in his De concordia (§2). I’ll then look at Scotus’s deployment, revision, and rejection of Anselm’s theory in his three discussions of angelic sin: Lect. 2 d. 6 q. 2 (§3), Ord. 2 d. 6 q. 2 (§4), and Rep. 2 d. 6 q. 2 (§5). This will be followed by a brief look at whether Scotus’s theory of the self-regulating will is an adequate replacement for Anselm’s account (§6).
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,122
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Anselm, Gaunilo, and Lost Island.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 1994 - Philosophy and Theology 8 (3):243-249.
Anselm on Truth.Thomas Williams & Sandra Visser - 2005 - In Brian Leftow & Brian Davies (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press. pp. 204-221.
Anselm on Freedom. [REVIEW]Thomas Williams - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009.
Anselm on Nothing.Ben Novak - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (3):305-320.
Anselm on Freedom and the Will.Jasper Hopkins - 1983 - Philosophy Research Archives 9:471-493.
In Defense of Anselm.Mark Owen Webb - 2005 - Philo 8 (1):55-58.
Saint Anselm.Thomas Williams - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to PP index
2009-05-16

Total downloads
78 ( #69,168 of 2,191,314 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #144,668 of 2,191,314 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature