The cambridge companion to duns scotus

Peter R. King
Nottingham University (PhD)
[1] In twelve quite demanding chapters, outstanding scholars provide an overall view of the key issues of Scotus’s philosophical thought. To this a very concise introduction is added, concerning the life and works of John Duns (very good, especially the survey of works and the information on critical editions etc.). Throughout the book, I find the information clear and the difficult topics well explained. Moreover, the volume gives a quick entrance to the vast literature. Among the topics discussed are: ‘Metaphysics’ (Peter King), ‘Universals and Individuation’ (Timothy Noone), ‘Modal Theory’ (Calvin Normore), ‘Natural Theology’ (James Ross & Todd Bates), ‘Philosophy of Mind’ (Richard Cross), ‘Cognition’ (Robert Pasnau), ‘Moral Dispositions’ (Bonnie Kent). What strikes the eye is the absence of important theological subjects: Trinity, Christology, sin and grace, to name a few. Since the cover text promises that ‘the essays in this volume systematically survey the full range of Scotus’ thought’, this omission is remarkable. It stems, I guess, from the strict philosophical scope of the series of the Cambridge Companions, but such a limitation should have been recognised explicitly: this companion provides, in fact, an introduction to John Duns’s philosophy—i.e., philosophy in our modern sense. Of course, this separation of philosophical from theological thought is not from Scotus. Most of his innovative ‘philosophical’ ideas are developed in a profoundly theological context!
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,715
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Duck's Leg: Descartes's Intermediate Distinction.Deborah Brown - 2011 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35 (1):26-45.
Duns Scotus’ Univocity: Applied to the Debate on Phenomenological Theology.Guus H. Labooy - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (1):53-73.
Relations and the Historiography of Medieval Philosophy.John Marenbon - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (3):387-404.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Distinction Between Nature and Will in Duns Scotus.Tobias Hoffmann - 1999 - Archives D’Histoire Doctrinale Et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 66:189-224.
Duns Scotus.Richard Cross - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
John Duns Scotus.Thomas Williams - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Duns Scotus: Some Recent Research.Richard Cross - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (3):271-295.
The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus.William A. Frank - 2006 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):146-150.


Added to PP index

Total views
32 ( #315,004 of 2,386,632 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,015 of 2,386,632 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes