Vivarium 46 (3):253-274 (2008)
Mediaeval psychological theory was a “faculty psychology”: a confederation of semiautonomous sub-personal agents, the interaction of which constitutes our psychological experience. One such faculty was intellective appetite, that is, the will. On what grounds was the will taken to be a distinct faculty? After a brief survey of Aristotle's criteria for identifying and distinguishing mental faculties, I look in some detail at the mainstream mediaeval view, given clear expression by Thomas Aquinas, and then at the dissenting views of John Duns Scotus and William of Ockham. I conclude with some reflections on why the mainstream mediaeval view was discarded by Descartes.
|Keywords||MEDIEVAL PSYCHOLOGY OCKHAM SCOTUS AQUINAS MENTAL FACULTIES WILL|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Casimir: An Architecture for Mental Spatial Knowledge Processing.Holger Schultheis & Thomas Barkowsky - 2011 - Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (4):778-795.
The Good, the Bad, and the Irrational: Three Views of Mental Content.Andrew E. Newman - 2004 - Philosophical Psychology 17 (1):95-106.
Linguistic Apprehension as Incidental Sensation in Thomas Aquinas.Daniel D. De Haan - 2010 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:179-196.
Communicative Competence and the Architecture of the Mind/Brain.Maurizio Tirassa - 1999 - Philosophical Explorations.
Mindreading: Mental State Ascription and Cognitive Architecture.Joseph L. H. Cruz - 1998 - Mind and Language 13 (3):323-340.
The Nature of the Mind.Marleen Rozemond - 2006 - In Stephen Gaukroger (ed.), Blackwell Guide to Descartes’ Meditations. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 48--66.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads101 ( #50,762 of 2,177,930 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #73,386 of 2,177,930 )
How can I increase my downloads?