I take "philosophy" to be an English word referring to a certain kind of thinking, a certain kind of approach to a certain kind of problem. To explain those "certain kind of"s would take a book; perhaps the best I can do here is gesture at what it is that English-language philosophers do.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Scott Soames, Beyond Rigidity, The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, Ix + 379 Pp. [REVIEW]Jaroslav Peregrin - unknown
Crossing the Finite Provinces of Meaning. Experience and Metaphor.Gerd Sebald - 2011 - Human Studies 34 (4):341-352.
Deception.Leonard Linsky - 1963 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):157 – 169.
Historicity and the Politics of Predication.Joseph Margolis - 2007 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (1):79-100.
An Inferentialist Approach to Semantics: Time for a New Kind of Structuralism?Jaroslav Peregrin - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (6):1208-1223.
On Rigidity, Direct Reference and Natural Kind Terms.Luis Fernández Moreno - 2007 - In María José Frápolli (ed.), Saying, Meaning and Referring: Essays on François Recanati's Philosophy of Language. Palgrave-Macmillan.
That May Be Jupiter: A Heuristic for Thinking Two-Dimensionally.Berit Brogaard - 2007 - American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (4):315 - 328.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #353,352 of 2,169,111 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,850 of 2,169,111 )
How can I increase my downloads?