The Problem with Negligence

Social Theory and Practice 35 (4):577-595 (2009)

Authors
Matt King
University of Alabama, Birmingham
Abstract
Ordinary morality judges agents blameworthy for negligently produced harms. In this paper I offer two main reasons for thinking that explaining just how negligent agents are responsible for the harms they produce is more problematic than one might think. First, I show that negligent conduct is characterized by the lack of conscious control over the harm, which conflicts with the ordinary view that responsibility for something requires at least some conscious control over it. Second, I argue that negligence is relevantly indistinguishable from inadvertence, which is ordinarily thought to excuse agents from responsibility. I argue that the parallels between negligence and inadvertence suggest that negligent agents are not responsible for the harms they produce, while proposing an alternative model for distinguishing between negligence and inadvertence that does justice to our intuitions.
Keywords moral responsibility  negligence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/soctheorpract200935433
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Non-Tracing Cases of Culpable Ignorance.Holly M. Smith - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (2):115-146.
A Puzzle Concerning Blame Transfer.Philip Robichaud & Jan Willem Wieland - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (1):3-26.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Responsibility and the Negligence Standard.Joseph Raz - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (1):1-18.
Responsibility in Negligence: Why the Duty of Care is Not a Duty “To Try”.Ori J. Herstein - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23 (2):403-428.
Crimes of Negligence: Attempting and Succeeding. [REVIEW]Alfred R. Mele - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):387-398.
When is Negligent Inadvertence Culpable?Kenneth W. Simons - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (2):97-114.
Being in the World.Joseph Raz - 2010 - Ratio 23 (4):433-452.
Toward a Moral Theory of Negligence Law.Ernest J. Weinrib - 1983 - Law and Philosophy 2 (1):37 - 62.
Moral Responsibility for Unprevented Harm.Friderik Klampfer - 2004 - Acta Analytica 19 (33):119-161.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-10-05

Total views
571 ( #5,975 of 2,243,856 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
55 ( #11,021 of 2,243,856 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature