The relationship between clinical audit and ethics

Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (4):250-253 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to start a debate about ethical issues associated with the practice of clinical audit. This is an area that has not received much consideration. The role of clinical audit is to raise general clinical standards. The ethical issues of clinical audit may have far-reaching consequences for clinicians, patients, health care providers and purchasers. Guidance is required to provide consistency in approach so that those involved in clinical audit, at whatever level, can be confident that they are following good practice. Clinicians and managers often think of good practice as being a technical matter. The main point of this paper is to bring out important ethical dimensions to good practice

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Clinical audit and reform of the UK research ethics review system.E. Cave & C. Nichols - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (3):181-203.
What kind of doing is clinical ethics?George J. Agich - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (1):7-24.
The critical turn in clinical ethics and its continous enhancement.Laurence B. McCullough - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):1 – 8.
Clinical ethics as medical hermeneutics.David C. Thomasma - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (2).
Hermeneutical clinical ethics: A commentary.Stephen L. Daniel - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (2).
Phronesis in clinical ethics.Glenn Mcgee - 1996 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (4).

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
62 (#260,913)

6 months
10 (#272,956)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The evolution of clinical audit as a tool for quality improvement.Berk Michael, Callaly Thomas & Hyland Mary - 2003 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (2):251-257.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references