Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):86-100 (2010)
AbstractThe Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 prohibits most forms of discrimination on the basis of genetic information in health insurance and employment. The findings cited as justification for the act, the almost universal political support for it, and much of the scholarly literature about genetic discrimination, all betray a confusion about what is really at issue. They imply that genetic discrimination is wrong mainly because of genetic exceptionalism: because some special feature of genetic information makes discrimination on the basis thereof wrong. I suggest, to the contrary, that the best arguments against genetic discrimination assume that health care is an entitlement . I do this by examining two different exceptionalist arguments for genetic nondiscrimination, showing that they do not furnish good reasons for prohibiting genetic discrimination unless one supposes that health care is an entitlement
Similar books and articles
What is genetic information, and why is it significant? A contextual, contrastive, approach.Neil C. Manson - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):1–16.
Distinguishing genetic from nongenetic medical tests: Some implications for antidiscrimination legislation.Joseph S. Alper & Jon Beckwith - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2):141-150.
The use of genetic test information in insurance: The argument from indistinguishability reconsidered.V. Launis - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):299-310.
Individual, family, and societal dimensions of genetic discrimination: A case study analysis. [REVIEW]Lisa N. Geller, Joseph S. Alper, Paul R. Billings, Carol I. Barash, Jonathan Beckwith & Marvin R. Natowicz - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1):71-88.
Are genetic self-tests dangerous? Assessing the commercialization of genetic testing in terms of personal autonomy.Ludvig Beckman - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (5-6):387-398.
Genetic Privacy Laws and Patients' Fear of Discrimination by Health Insurers: The View from Genetic Counselors.Mark A. Hall & Stephen S. Rich - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):245-257.
Reassessing insurers' access to genetic information: Genetic privacy, ignorance, and injustice.Eli Feiring - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (5):300-310.
Genetic information: Important but not “exceptional”. [REVIEW]Ruth Hannah Wilkinson - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):457-472.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Genetic Testing, Conscientious Refusal of Medical Treatment to Children, and Organ Donation: An Introduction.A. E. Hinkley - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):81-85.
References found in this work
Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.Fred Feldman & J. L. Mackie - 1979 - Philosophical Review 88 (1):134.
Ethics, Inventing Right and Wrong.[author unknown] - 1977 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 43 (3):581-582.