Proportionality in Sentencing and the Restorative Justice Paradigm: 'Just Deserts' for Victims and Defendants Alike? [Book Review]
Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (2):197-213 (2010)
AbstractThe doctrine of proportionality seeks to limit arbitrary and capricious punishment in order to ensure that offenders are punished according to their âjust desertâ. In Australian sentencing law, proportionality goes some way toward achieving this âbalancedâ approach by requiring a court to consider various and often competing interests in formulating a sentence commensurate with offence seriousness and offender culpability. Modification of sentencing law by the introduction of victim impact statements or the requirement that sentencing courts take explicit account of the harm done to the victim and community has generated debate, however, as to the extent to which offenders may be now subject to unjustified, harsher punishments. This article proposes that in order to overcome the controversy of the modification of offender and victim rights in sentencing, sentencing courts adhere to a doctrine of proportionality that is explicitly sensitive to the needs of victims and offenders in a model of restorative justice that focuses on the consequences of crime as against the individual, rather than the state. The extent to which proportionality, as the current constitutive principle of Australian sentencing law, may be modified to better encourage a dialogue between victim and offender is discussed.
Similar books and articles
Recent developments in victim agency in the new south wales justice system: The case of victim impact statements.Tyrone Kirchengast - manuscript
Sentencing law and the 'emotional catharsis' of victim's rights in nsw homicide cases.Tyrone Kirchengast - unknown
The Story of Justice: Retribution, Mercy, and the Role of Emotions in the Capital Sentencing Process. [REVIEW]Mary Sigler - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (3):339-367.
The ethics of sentencing white-collar criminals.Phillip Balsmeier & Jennifer Kelly - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (2):143 - 152.
Sentencing: Must justice be even-handed? [REVIEW]Michael Davis - 1982 - Law and Philosophy 1 (1):77 - 117.
Proportionality in the criminal law: The differing american versus canadian approaches to punishment.Roozbeh Baker - unknown
Why Should Remorse be a Mitigating Factor in Sentencing?Steven Keith Tudor - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):241-257.
Sentencing our children to die in prison: Global law and practice.Constance de la Vega & Michelle T. Leighton - unknown
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The principle of proportionality revisited: interpretations and applications. [REVIEW]Göran Hermerén - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (4):373-382.
Can Restorative Justice provide a solution to the problem of incoherence in sentencing?Elizabeth Tiarks - unknown
References found in this work
Proportionate Sentencing: Exploring the Principles.Andrew Von Hirsch & Andrew Ashworth - 2005 - Oxford University Press UK.