The Cerberus: Parental Licensing And The Equalization Of Opportunity

Dissertation, Georgia State University (2015)


Hugh Lafollette’s theoretical justification of parental licensing hinges upon consideration of the harms associated with raising children. If we understand Lafollette’s stance as one in which the moral status of children is equal to that of other human beings, we must consider what such a commitment might require of social institutions such as the family. Unlike other licensing programs, I argue that Lafollette’s parental licensing program serves as a tool by which fair equality of opportunity can be acquired for those living within a given society. I attempt to demonstrate how the normative views as to the sovereignty of parents serve to discount the moral status of children, thus limiting the protections offered against child maltreatment. I will show how Lafollette’s theoretical justifications align with concerns addressed in John Stuart Mill’s harm principle and Rawlsian views as to the importance of access to fair equality of opportunity.

Download options


    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,879

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

17 (#642,402)

6 months
2 (#257,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Justice as Fairness.John Rawls - 1998 - In James Rachels (ed.), Ethical Theory 2: Theories About How We Should Live. Oxford University Press.
Rights.Leif Wenar - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Licensing Parents.Hugh LaFollette - 1980 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (2):182-197.
Political Liberalism, Cultural Membership, and the Family.Ron Mallon - 1999 - Social Theory and Practice 25 (2):271-297.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Licensing Parents.Hugh LaFollette - 1980 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (2):182-197.
Parental Licensing Meets Evolutionary Psychology.Tomislav Bracanović - 2012 - Ethical Perspectives 19 (2):207-233.
Can a Right to Reproduce Justify the Status Quo on Parental Licensing?Andrew Botterell & Carolyn McLeod - 2015 - In Richard Vernon, Sarah Hannan & Samantha Brennan (eds.), Permissible Progeny: The Morality of Procreation and Parenting. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 184-207.
Licensing Parents to Protect Our Children?Jurgen De Wispelaere & Daniel Weinstock - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):195-205.
Licensing Parents Revisited.Hugh Lafollette - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (4):327-343.
From Rawlsian Autonomy to Sufficient Opportunity in Education.Liam Shields - 2015 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 14 (1):1470594-13505413.
Expanding Opportunity Structures.Dawn B. Neill - 2010 - Human Nature 21 (2):165-185.
Parents' Rights.J. T. Thornton - 1987 - Dissertation, Rice University
Prenatal Equality of Opportunity.Eszter Kollar & Michele Loi - 2015 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (1):35-49.
On Licentious Licensing: A Reply to Hugh LaFollette.Lawrence E. Frisch - 1982 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 11 (2):173-180.
Equality of Opportunity Globalized?Darrel Moellendorf - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 19 (2).