Philosophical Studies 49 (1):19 - 26 (1986)

After explaining the philosophical significance of the paradox and explaining what an adequate dissolution must do, i show that the story of the unexpected exam hides within it two distinctly different paradoxes. the first turns on a problem of self-reference, but all previous attempts to dissolve the paradox fail to dissolve the second. i then dissolve it
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00372880
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,447
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On Paradoxes and a Surprise Exam.Richard L. Kirkham - 1991 - Philosophia 21 (1-2):31-51.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
43 ( #217,414 of 2,326,348 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #644,397 of 2,326,348 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes