Philosophical Review 91 (1):41-72 (1982)

Authors
Patricia Kitcher
Columbia University
Abstract
Despite Kemp Smith's claims to the contrary, I show that there is good reason to believe that Kant was aware of Hume's attack on personal identity. My interpretive claim is that we can make sense of many of Kant's puzzling remarks in the subjective deduction by assuming that he was trying to reply to Hume's challenge. My substantive claim is that Kant succeeds in defending a notion of the self as a continuing sequence of informationally interdependent states.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2184668
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,497
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Kant's Subjective Deduction.Nathan Bauer - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):433-460.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
116 ( #80,143 of 2,348,160 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #329,024 of 2,348,160 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes