The Zhuangzi raises skeptical problems it does not solve. At best, it asserts that solutions are unnecessary but does not prove it. This is not a fault of the text or its author; it is the logical consequence of the arguments themselves. Philosophically speaking, The Zhuangzi raises doubts, nothing more. Whether this is a good thing or a bad thing, and what we are supposed to do about it, is something we are left to decide for ourselves.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11712-007-9017-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,518
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Therapy of Desire.Martha Nussbaum - 1994 - Princeton University Press.
The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu.Burton Watson (ed.) - 1968 - Columbia University Press.
Three Ways of Thought in Ancient China.Arthur Waley - 1939 - Stanford University Press.
What Is Taoism?H. G. Creel - 1956 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 76 (3):139-152.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
53 ( #191,481 of 2,421,926 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #545,840 of 2,421,926 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes