Social Philosophy Today 24:121-129 (2008)
In this essay, we examine one of our perennial favorites, the story of “The Sneetches” (the first of four stories in Seuss 1961) as an exposition and condemnation of the role of shame and humiliation in maintaining oppressive social systems. We argue that Seuss’s Sneetches vividly demonstrate how we contribute to the unjustified oppression of a disadvantaged group when we allow our shaming behaviors to be guided by stereotypical presumptions about aperson’s moral character based on non-voluntary personal characteristics, rather than by evaluations of character based on the evidence of voluntary behavior
|Keywords||Conference Proceedings Social and Political Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Humiliation, Dignity and Self-Respect.Daniel Statman - 2000 - Philosophical Psychology 13 (4):523 – 540.
Kant's Culture of Humiliation: Politics and Ethical Cultivation.Paul Saurette - 2002 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (1):59-90.
Resisting Agamben: The Biopolitics of Shame and Humiliation.Lisa Guenther - 2012 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (1):59-79.
The Taint of Shame: Failure, Self-Distress, and Moral Growth.Johann A. Klaassen - 2001 - Journal of Social Philosophy 32 (2):174–196.
Shame and Guilt in Restorative Justice.Raffaele Rodogno - 2008 - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 14 (2):142-176.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads23 ( #221,205 of 2,178,129 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,663 of 2,178,129 )
How can I increase my downloads?