Induction and Inductive Definitions in Fragments of Second Order Arithmetic

Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (4):1087 - 1107 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A fragment with the same provably recursive functions as n iterated inductive definitions is obtained by restricting second order arithmetic in the following way. The underlying language allows only up to n + 1 nested second order quantifications and those are in such a way, that no second order variable occurs free in the scope of another second order quantifier. The amount of induction on arithmetical formulae only affects the arithmetical consequences of these theories, whereas adding induction for arbitrary formulae increases the strength by one inductive definition

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,326

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Parameter-free polymorphic types.Klaus Aehlig - 2008 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 156 (1):3-12.
Fragments of Heyting arithmetic.Wolfgang Burr - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (3):1223-1240.
Multi-sorted version of second order arithmetic.Farida Kachapova - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Logic 13 (5).
An Independence Result on Weak Second Order Bounded Arithmetic.Satoru Kuroda - 2001 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (2):183-186.
Finitist Axiomatic Truth.Sato Kentaro & Jan Walker - 2023 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 88 (1):22-73.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
62 (#277,305)

6 months
14 (#351,015)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Parameter-free polymorphic types.Klaus Aehlig - 2008 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 156 (1):3-12.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A slow growing analogue to buchholz' proof.Toshiyasu Arai - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 54 (2):101-120.

Add more references