The evolutionary psychology of human mating: A response to Buller's critique

Abstract

In this paper, I critique arguments made by philosopher David Buller against central evolutionary-psychological explanations of human mating. Specifically, I aim to rebut his criticisms of Evolutionary Psychology regarding (1) women's long-term mating preferences for high-status men; (2) the evolutionary rationale behind men's provisioning of women; (3) men's mating preferences for young women; (4) women's adaptation for extra-pair sex; (5) the sex-differentiated evolutionary theory of human jealousy; and (6) the notion of mate value. In sum, I aim to demonstrate that Buller's arguments contra Evolutionary Psychologists are left wanting.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-06-13

Downloads
470 (#20,640)

6 months
22 (#40,598)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1991 - London and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1991 - London and New York: Routledge.
Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):421-423.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sexual Selection and Mate Choice in Evolutionary Psychology.Chris Haufe - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (1):115-128.