Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (3-4):379-404 (2018)

Authors
Max Kölbel
University of Vienna
Abstract
The prevailing theoretical framework for theorising about representation construes all representation as involving objective representational contents. This classic framework has tended to drive philosophers either to claim that evaluative judgements are representations and therefore objective, or else to claim that evaluative judgements are not really representations, because they are not objective. However, a more general, already well-explored framework is available, which will allow theorists to treat evaluative judgements as full-fledged representations while leaving open whether they are objective. Such a more general conception of representational content is exemplified, e.g. by Lewis's ‘centred contents’ and Gibbard's framework of ‘contents of judgement’, thus it is not new. I shall start in §1 by introducing the more general framework of perspectival contents and then illustrate in §2 how awareness of it can help expose the fallaciousness of certain widely used forms of argumentation in metaethics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/00455091.2018.1432398
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,703
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Language, Truth, and Logic.Alfred Jules Ayer - 1936 - London: V. Gollancz.
The Language of Morals.Richard Mervyn Hare - 1952 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

View all 57 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Objectivity and Perspectival Content.Max Kölbel - forthcoming - Erkenntnis:1-23.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Science as Representation: Flouting the Criteria.Bas van Fraassen - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):794-804.
Fallacies.Robert J. Fogelin & Timothy J. Duggan - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):255-262.
Perspectival Representation and the Knowledge Argument.William Lycan - 2003 - In Quentin Smith & Aleksandar Jokic (eds.), Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 384.
The Coherence of Hamblin's Fallacies.Ralph Johnson - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (4):305-317.
The Nature and Explanatory Ambitions of Metaethics.Tristram McPherson & David Plunkett - 2017 - In Tristram McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. Routledge. pp. 1-28.
Fallacies and Argument Appraisal.Christopher W. Tindale - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Three Fallacies.Jonathan E. Adler - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):665-666.
Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings.Hans Vilhelm Hansen & Robert C. Pinto (eds.) - 1995 - University Park, PA, USA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-02-18

Total views
48 ( #227,354 of 2,462,536 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,311 of 2,462,536 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes