Routledge (2002)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The mainstream view in the philosophy of language holds that every meaningful sentence has a truth-condition. This view, however, runs into difficulties with non-objective sentences such as sentences on matters of taste or value: these do not appear to be either true or false, but are generally taken to be meaningful. How can this conflict be resolved?
Truth Without Objectivity examines various ways of resolving this fundamental problem, before developing and defending its own original solution, a relativist theory of truth. Standard solutions maintain either that in uttering non-objective sentences speakers make implicit reference to their own preferences and thus have unproblematic truth conditions, or that they have no truth conditions at all. Max Kölbel argues that both of these proposed solutions are inadequate, and that a third well-known position, minimalism, can only solve the problem if it is developed in the direction of relativism about truth.
Kölbel defends the idea that truth (as invoked in semantics) is a neutral notion: a sentence’s possessing a truth condition does not yet entail that it concerns an objective subject matter, because truth and objectivity are independent of one another. He argues that this notion of ‘truth without objectivity’ leads directly to relativism about truth, and goes on to defend one form of relativism against well-known objections.
|
Keywords | Truth Objectivity Meaning Relativism |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2009 |
Buy this book | $38.26 used (19% off) $42.95 new (9% off) $46.95 from Amazon Amazon page |
ISBN(s) | 9780415272445 0415272440 9780203870181 9780415272452 0415272459 0203870182 |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00467.x |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications.John MacFarlane - 2014 - Oxford University Press.
Context Dependence, Disagreement, and Predicates of Personal Taste.Peter Lasersohn - 2005 - Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (6):643--686.
The Assessment Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions.John MacFarlane - 2005 - In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 197--234.
View all 100 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
The Theory of Truth in the Theory of Meaning.Gurpreet S. Rattan - 2004 - European Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):214–243.
The Inconsistency of Deflationary Truth and Davidsonian Meaning.Kari Middleton - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:99-103.
The Argument From Ignorance Against Truth-Conditional Semantics.Paul Saka - 2007 - American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):157 - 169.
Review: Crispin Wright: Truth and Objectivity. [REVIEW]R. M. Sainsbury - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (4):899 - 904.
Knowledge, Context, and the Agent's Point of View.Timothy Williamson - 2005 - In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Oxford University Press. pp. 91--114.
Realism, Deflationism, and Success.Jerry Kapus - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 15:75-81.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-02-06
Total views
134 ( #71,493 of 2,403,705 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #126,652 of 2,403,705 )
2014-02-06
Total views
134 ( #71,493 of 2,403,705 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #126,652 of 2,403,705 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads