Internet Policy Review 1:1-11 (2019)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
More and more researchers argue that online technologies manipulate human users and, therefore, undermine their autonomy. We call this the MAL view on online technology because it argues from Manipulation to Autonomy-Loss. MAL enjoys public visibility and will shape the academic discussion to come. This view of online technology, however, fails conceptually. MAL presupposes that manipulation equals autonomy loss, and that autonomy is the absence of manipulation. That is mistaken. In short, an individual can be manipulated while being fully personally autonomous. Internet policy researchers should be aware of this point to avoid looking in the wrong place in future research on manipulative and harmful online technology.
|
| Keywords | Autonomy Manipulation Digital ethics Ethics of technology Social media |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
(Online) Manipulation: Sometimes Hidden, Always Careless.Michael Klenk - forthcoming - Review of Social Economy.
The Influence of Situational Factors in Sacrificial Dilemmas on Utilitarian Moral Judgments.Michael Klenk - forthcoming - Review of Philosophy and Psychology:1-33.
Similar books and articles
Technology, Autonomy, and Manipulation.Daniel Susser, Beate Roessler & Helen Nissenbaum - 2019 - Internet Policy Review 8 (2).
Digital Well-Being and Manipulation Online.Michael Klenk - forthcoming - In Christopher Burr & Luciano Floridi (eds.), Ethics of Digital Well-being: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Springer.
Counter-Manipulation and Health Promotion.T. M. Wilkinson - 2017 - Public Health Ethics 10 (3):257-266.
Autonomy Online: Jacques Ellul and the Facebook Emotional Manipulation Study.Nolen Gertz - 2016 - Research Ethics 12 (1):55-61.
Manipulation in the Enrollment of Research Participants.Amulya Mandava & Joseph Millum - 2013 - Hastings Center Report 43 (2):38-47.
Freedom and Indoctrination.Michael Garnett - 2015 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 115 (2pt2):93-108.
What’s Wrong with Motive Manipulation?Eric M. Cave - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (2):129-144.
Influence: Coercion, Manipulation, and Persuasion.Claudia Jane Mills - 1991 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Autonomy and Authenticity of Enhanced Personality Traits.Jan Christoph Bublitz & Reinhard Merkel - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (6):360-374.
Prescriptions: Autonomy, Humanism and the Purpose of Health Technology.Eric L. Krakauer - 1998 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (6):525-545.
A Framework for Assessing the Moral Status of Manipulation,.J. S. Blumenthal-Barby - 2014 - In Christian Coons Michael Weber (ed.), Manipulation. Oxford University Press. pp. 121-134.
Leadership Manipulation and Ethics in Storytelling.Tommi P. Auvinen, Anna-Maija Lämsä, Teppo Sintonen & Tuomo Takala - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 116 (2):415-431.
The Trouble with Externalist Compatibilist Autonomy.Stefaan E. Cuypers - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 129 (2):171-196.
On the Call for a Feminist Notion of Autonomy in Biomedical Ethics.Jennifer A. Parks - 1996 - Dissertation, Mcmaster University (Canada)
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-12-19
Total views
197 ( #50,103 of 2,432,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #12,903 of 2,432,249 )
2019-12-19
Total views
197 ( #50,103 of 2,432,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #12,903 of 2,432,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
