Between Anarchism and Suicide: On William James's Religious Therapy

Philosophers' Imprint 19 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

William James’s religious writing displays a therapeutic concern for two key social problems: an epidemic of suicide among educated Victorians who worried that a scientific worldview left no room for God; and material poverty and bleak employment prospects for others. James sought a conception of God that would therapeutically comfort his melancholic peers while also girding them to fight for better social conditions—a fight he associated with political anarchism. What is perhaps most unique about James’s approach to religion emerges when we consider the relationship of his therapeutic project to his treatment of religious epistemology. For James took his suicidal peers to need more than tea and sympathy. They needed to be convinced, through rational argument, that religious faith is epistemically permissible in light of their methodological naturalism. That is to say that theoretic success in James’s treatment of religion is to be measured by therapeutic success. His argument for epistemic permissibility began by treating religious faith as a “hypothesis.” He took naturalism to permit entertaining a hypothesis just in case it is testable, and not contravened by available evidence. So he developed a distinctive conception of God—what he called the “pluralistic hypothesis”—that proposed a plurality of independent entities in the universe, only one of which is God. In contrast to the monistic hypothesis, pluralism is empirically testable in principle. But crucially, the hypothesis is underdetermined by any evidence available now. This purported, in-principle testability would make religious pluralism epistemically permissible to entertain. And since salvation is possible on this view without being guaranteed, the pluralistic hypothesis stands to discourage social and political quietism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,594

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science, Religion, and “The Will to Believe".Alexander Klein - 2015 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5 (1):72-117.
William James and a Science of Religions.Owen Anderson - 2005 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (2):443-444.
William James and the Right to Over-Believe.William Lad Sessions - 1981 - Philosophy Research Archives 7:996-1045.
Courage, Caution and Heaven’s Gate: Testing James’ Pragmatic Defense of Religious Belief.Guy Axtell - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:77-89.
William James on Ethics and Faith.Michael R. Slater - 2009 - Cambridge University Press.
Deweyan Pragmatism.Randy L. Friedman - 2006 - William James Studies 1.
William James on Ethics and Faith.Michael R. Slater - 2009 - Cambridge University Press.
William James' Viewpoint on Emotional Feelings and Rationality of Religious Beliefs.Mohammad Hadi Shahab - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 10 (38):41-58.
William James.Max Carl Otto (ed.) - 1942 - Madison, the University of Wisconsin Press.
William James on Ethics and Faith by Michael R. Slater (Review).Jacob L. Goodson - 2013 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 34 (3):285-288.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-10

Downloads
28 (#413,491)

6 months
1 (#418,924)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexander Klein
McMaster University

Citations of this work

How American Is Pragmatism?Alexander Klein - 2021 - Philosophy of Science 88 (5):849-859.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references