Philosophy and Technology 34 (3):525-544 (2020)

Authors
Michael Klenk
Delft University of Technology
Abstract
According to some philosophers of technology, technology embodies moral values in virtue of its functional properties and the intentions of its designers. But this paper shows that such an account makes the values supposedly embedded in technology epistemically opaque and that it does not allow for values to change. Therefore, to overcome these shortcomings, the paper introduces the novel Affordance Account of Value Embedding as a superior alternative. Accordingly, artefacts bear affordances, that is, artefacts make certain actions likelier given the circumstances. Based on an interdisciplinary perspective that invokes recent moral anthropology, I conceptualize affordances as response-dependent properties. That is, they depend on intrinsic as well as extrinsic properties of the artefact. We have reason to value these properties. Therefore, artefacts embody values and are not value-neutral, which has practical implications for the design of new technologies.
Keywords moral value  value theory  philosophy of technology  affordances  response-dependent properties
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2021
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s13347-020-00401-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,587
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Dispositional Theories of Value.Michael Smith, David Lewis & Mark Johnston - 1989 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 63 (1):89-174.
Two Distinctions in Goodness.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (2):169-195.
Do Artifacts Have Politics?Langdon Winner - 1980 - Daedalus 109 (1):121--136.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Can Technological Artefacts Be Moral Agents?Martin Peterson - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):411-424.
Is Technology Value-Neutral?Boaz Miller - 2021 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 46 (1):53-80.
How Artefacts Influence Our Actions.Auke J. K. Pols - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):575-587.
Artefacts and Functions: A Note on the Value of Nature.Eric Katz - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (3):223-232.
The Functional Bias of the Dual Nature of Technical Artefacts Program.Krist Vaesen - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):190-197.
A Practically Useful Metaphysics of Technology.Sadjad Soltanzadeh - 2019 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 23 (2):232-250.
Artefacts and Living Artefacts.Helena Siipi - 2003 - Environmental Values 12 (4):413-430.
Coherence of Structural and Functional Descriptions of Technical Artefacts.Peter Kroes - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (1):137-151.
Wie Aus Gedanken Dinge Werden. Eine Philosophie der Artefakte.Maria E. Reicher - 2013 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 61 (2):219-232.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-05-15

Total views
47 ( #231,887 of 2,461,976 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #70,470 of 2,461,976 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes