How to be an infinitist about doxastic justification

Philosophical Studies 134 (1):25 - 29 (2007)

Authors
Peter Klein
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy of Religion   Philosophy of Mind   Epistemology   Logic   Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-006-9017-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,966
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Infinitism and Scepticism.Tim Oakley - 2019 - Episteme 16 (1):108-118.
Infinitism, Finitude and Normativity.John Turri - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (3):791-795.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the Regress Argument for Infinitism.John Turri - 2009 - Synthese 166 (1):157 - 163.
Why Justification Matters.Declan Smithies - 2015 - In David Henderson & John Greco (eds.), Epistemic Evaluation: Point and Purpose in Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 224-244.
Structural Justification.Robert Audi - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:473-492.
Justification by an Infinity of Conditional Probabilities.David Atkinson & Jeanne Peijnenburg - 2009 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 50 (2):183-193.
On the Relationship Between Propositional and Doxastic Justification.John Turri - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (2):312-326.
Is Klein an Infinitist About Doxastic Justification?Michael Bergmann - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 134 (1):19 - 24.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
184 ( #36,295 of 2,235,935 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #293,259 of 2,235,935 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature