SGIR Review 2 (2):3-22 (2019)

Pauline Kleingeld
University of Groningen
Kant is famous for his universalist moral theory, which emphasizes human dignity, equality, and autonomy. Yet he also defended sexist and (until late in his life) racist views. In this essay, I address the question of how current readers of Kant should deal with Kant’s sexism and racism. I first provide a brief description of Kant’s views on sexual and racial hierarchies, and of the way they intersect. I then turn to the question of whether we should set aside Kant’s sexism and racism or ‘translate’ his egalitarian principles into inegalitarian ones. I argue for a third position, namely, that we should highlight the tensions that pervade Kant’s theory. In the final section, I argue that the use of inclusive language and female pronouns in recent discussions of Kant’s moral and political philosophy carries significant risks. I end by articulating several preconditions for fruitfully using Kant’s moral principles to criticize sexism and racism.
Keywords Immanuel Kant  Racism  Sexism  Inclusive language
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.Immanuel Kant - 1996 - In Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 37-108.
Objectification.Martha C. Nussbaum - 1995 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (4):249-291.
Why Kant Is Not a Kantian.James Conant - 2016 - Philosophical Topics 44 (1):75-125.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

How to Use Someone ‘Merely as a Means’.Pauline Kleingeld - 2020 - Kantian Review 25 (3):389-414.
Principles and Duties: A Critique of Common Morality Theory.Robert Baker - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (2):199-211.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant’s Racism.Lucy Allais - 2016 - Philosophical Papers 45 (1-2):1-36.
Racism and Sexism: An Integrated Study. [REVIEW]Gail M. Presbey - 1990 - Radical Philosophy Review of Books 2 (2):29-32.
Kant's Second Thoughts on Race.Pauline Kleingeld - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):573–592.
Sexism and Racism: Some Conceptual Differences.Laurence Thomas - 2000 - In Bernard Boxill (ed.), Race and Racism. Oxford University Press.
Racism and Sexism.Richard A. Wasserstrom - 2000 - In Bernard Boxill (ed.), Race and Racism. Oxford University Press.
Sports Ethics: An Anthology.Jan Boxill (ed.) - 2002 - Wiley-Blackwell.


Added to PP index

Total views
13,358 ( #124 of 2,518,488 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2,724 ( #46 of 2,518,488 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes