The pseudodiagnosticity trap: Should participants consider alternative hypotheses?

Thinking and Reasoning 16 (4):332-345 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Escaping the epiphenomenal trap.Thomas W. Polger - 1998 - Southern Society for Philosophy and Psychology.
Rejoinder to Scott.Brian Zamulinski - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (2):225-229.
The bayesian treatment of auxiliary hypotheses.Michael Strevens - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):515-537.
Hypotheses? Forget about it!Massimo Pigliucci - 2009 - Philosophy Now (Jul/Aug):47.
Exploring mouse trap history.Joachim L. Dagg - 2011 - Evolution Education and Outreach 4 (3):397-414.
The sociobiology of sociopathy: An alternative hypothesis.Wim E. Crusio - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):154-155.
Confirmation theory.James Hawthorne - 2011 - In Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay & Malcolm Forster (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 7: Philosophy of Statistics. Elsevier.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-05

Downloads
36 (#455,463)

6 months
2 (#1,249,707)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?