The revenge of Pythagoras: How a mathematical sharp practice undermines the contemporary design argument in astrophysical cosmology


Authors
Robert Klee
Ithaca College
Abstract
Recent developments in astrophysical cosmology have revived support for the design argument among a growing clique of astrophysicists. I show that the scientific/mathematical evidence cited in support of intelligent design of the universe is infected with a mathematical sharp practice: the concepts of two numbers being of the same order of magnitude, and of being within an order of each other, have been stretched from their proper meanings so as to doctor the numbers evidentially. This practice started with A. S. Eddington and P. A. M. Dirac in the 1920s and 1930s, but it is still very much alive today. 1 Introduction 2 The birth of a sharp practice 3 High tide for the anthropic principle 4 How not to do things with numbers 5 The recalcitrant sloppiness of crud 6 How excited can excited carbon-12 be? 7 Is a pile of doubts a doubtful pile? 8 Conclusion
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/53.3.331
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,350
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Anthropic Cosmological Principle.J. J. C. Smart - 1986 - Philosophical Quarterly 37 (149):463-466.
Universes.Robert K. Clifton - 1991 - Philosophical Quarterly 41 (164):339-344.
There is No Adequate Definition of ?Fine-Tuned for Life?Neil A. Manson - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):341 – 351.
The Accidental Universe.P. C. W. Davies - 1982 - Cambridge University Press, 1982.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Fine-Tuning in the Context of Bayesian Theory Testing.Luke A. Barnes - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (2):253-269.
Astrophysical Fine Tuning, Naturalism, and the Contemporary Design Argument.Mark A. Walker & M. Milan - 2006 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):285 – 307.
Astrophysical Fine Tuning, Naturalism, and the Contemporary Design Argument.Mark A. Walker & Milan M. Ćirković - 2006 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):285-307.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
111 ( #78,003 of 2,291,079 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #832,027 of 2,291,079 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature