Social Cognition 30 (4):474-518 (2012)

Authors
Stanely Bernard Klein
University of California at Santa Barbara
Abstract
In this paper I argue that much of the confusion and mystery surrounding the concept of "self" can be traced to a failure to appreciate the distinction between the self as a collection of diverse neural components that provide us with our beliefs, memories, desires, personality, emotions, etc (the epistemological self) and the self that is best conceived as subjective, unified awareness, a point of view in the first person (ontological self). While the former can, and indeed has, been extensively studied by researchers of various disciplines in the human sciences, the latter most often has been ignored -- treated more as a place holder attached to a particular predicate of interest (e.g., concept, reference, deception, esteem, image, regulation, etc). These two aspects of the self, I contend, are not reducible -- one being an object (the epistemological self) and the other a subject (the ontological self). Until we appreciate the difficulties of applying scientific methods and analysis to what cannot be reduced to an object of inquiry without stripping it of its essential aspect (its status as subject), progress on the "self", taken as a pluralistic construct, will continue to address only one part of the problems we face in understanding this most fundamental aspect of human experience.
Keywords self  consciousness  materialism  metaphysics  phenomenology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

View all 245 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Sameness and the Self: Philosophical and Psychological Considerations.Stan Klein - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology -- Perception 5:1-15.
The Sense of Diachronic Personal Identity.Stan Klein - 2013 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (4):791-811.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Matrix as Metaphysics.David J. Chalmers - 2005 - In Christopher Grau (ed.), Philosophers Explore the Matrix. Oxford University Press. pp. 132.
Mesozoic Mammals and Early Mammalian Brain Diversity.Emmanuel Gilissen & Thierry Smith - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):556-557.
Beyond the Limits of the Brain as a Physical System.V. K. Jirsa & J. A. S. Kelso - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):405-406.
What is a Brain State?Richard Brown - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (6):729-742.
“Grammar Box” in the Brain.Valéria Csépe - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):672-673.
No “When” Without “Where”.Christian Quaia & Lance M. Optican - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):696-697.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-02-25

Total views
1,590 ( #2,674 of 2,454,814 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
77 ( #8,841 of 2,454,814 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes