The wisdom-of-crowds: an efficient, philosophically-validated, social epistemological network profiling toolkit

In Hocine Cherifi, Rosario Nunzio Mantegna, Luis M. Rocha, Chantal Cherifi & Salvatore Micciche (eds.), Complex Networks & Their Applications XI: Proceedings of The Eleventh International Conference on Complex Networks and their Applications: COMPLEX NETWORKS 2022 - Volume 1. Springer (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The epistemic position of an agent often depends on their position in a larger network of other agents who provide them with information. In general, agents are better off if they have diverse and independent sources. Sullivan et al. [19] developed a method for quantitatively characterizing the epistemic position of individuals in a network that takes into account both diversity and independence; and presented a proof-of-concept, closed-source implementation on a small graph derived from Twitter data [19]. This paper reports on an open-source reimplementation of their algorithm in Python, optimized to be usable on much larger networks. In addition to the algorithm and package, we also show the ability to scale up our package to large synthetic social network graph profiling, and finally demonstrate its utility in analyzing real-world empirical evidence of ‘echo chambers’ on online social media, as well as evidence of interdisciplinary diversity in an academic communications network.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Corporate Responsibilities in Internet-Enabled Social Networks.Stephen Chen - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (S4):523 - 536.
Social-networking and barriers.S. Vangorodskaya & L. Kolpina - 2012 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 4 (22):189-193.
Structure-sensitive testimonial norms.Benedikt T. A. Höltgen - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (3):1-23.
Do Scientists Need Social Networks for Scientists?Evgeny V. Maslanov - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (4):37-42.
Finding the Trustworthiness Nodes from Signed Social Networks.Xia Wang, Shu Zhang & Hui Li - 2013 - Journal of Intelligent Systems 22 (4):471-485.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-13

Downloads
254 (#70,481)

6 months
132 (#20,576)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Marinus Ferreira
Macquarie University
Mark Alfano
Macquarie University
Marc Cheong
University of Melbourne
1 more

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles.C. Th Nguyen - 2020 - Episteme 17 (2):141-161.
Technological Seduction and Self-Radicalization.Mark Alfano, Joseph Adam Carter & Marc Cheong - 2018 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association (3):298-322.
Epistemology.Matthias Steup - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 8 references / Add more references