Philosophy of Science 86 (5):1179–1190 (2019)

Alexander Klein
McMaster University
James developed an evolutionary objection to epiphenomenalism that is still discussed today. Epiphenomenalists have offered responses that do not grasp its full depth. I thus offer a new reading and assessment of James’s objection. Our life-essential, phenomenal pleasures and pains have three features that suggest that they were shaped by selection, according to James: they are natively patterned, those patterns are systematically linked with antecedent brain states, and the patterns are “universal” among humans. If epiphenomenalism were true, phenomenal patterns could not have been selected (because epiphenomenalism precludes phenomenal consciousness affecting reproductive success). So epiphenomenalism is likely false.
Keywords Epiphenomenalism, William James, Evolution, Consciousness, Adaptation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/705477
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Robinson’s Response to the Self-Stultifying Objection.Dwayne Moore - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (4):627-641.
Self-Stultification Objection.F. De Brigard - 2014 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 21 (5-6):120-130.
Epiphenomenalism and Agency.David Hommen - 2018 - Mind and Matter 16 (1):17–41.
Pleasure’s Role in Evolution: A Response to Robinson.Joseph Corabi - 2008 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (7):78-86.
Knowing Epiphenomena.William S. Robinson - 2006 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (1-2):85-100.
Taylor's Refutation of Epiphenomenalism.Richard Double - 1979 - Journal of Critical Analysis 8 (1):23-28.
Evolution and Epiphenomenalism.William Robinson - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (11):27-42.
On James’s Argument Against Epiphenomenalism.John Wright - 2015 - William James Studies 11 (1).
William James.Max Carl Otto (ed.) - 1942 - Madison, the University of Wisconsin Press.
Can Mary's Qualia Be Epiphenomenal?Daniel Lim & Wang Hao - 2014 - Res Philosophica 91 (3):503-512.


Added to PP index

Total views
166 ( #66,152 of 2,462,049 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #24,072 of 2,462,049 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes