Authors
Carline Klijnman
Università degli Studi di Genova
Abstract
In response to widespread voter ignorance, Jason Brennan argues for a voting ethics that can be summarized as one negative duty: do not vote badly. The implication that abstaining is always permissible entails no incentive for citizens to become competent voters or to vote once competent. Following the Condorcet Jury Theorem, this can lead to suboptimal outcomes, suggesting that voter turnout should concern instrumentalist epistemic accounts of democratic legitimacy. This could be addressed by adding two positive voting duties: to make an effort to become a competent voter; and, once competent, to vote.
Keywords voter ignorance  epistemic democracy  voting ethics  democratic legitimacy  condorcet jury theorem  citizen duties
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2021
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/08913811.2021.1932084
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Against Democracy: New Preface.Jason Brennan - 2016 - Princeton University Press.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (3):229-243.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Oxford University Press USA.
Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?Alvin I. Goldman - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):85-110.
The Epistemology of Democracy.Elizabeth Anderson - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):8-22.

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Democracy Without Enlightenment: A Jury Theorem for Evaluative Voting.Michael Morreau - 2021 - Journal of Political Philosophy 29 (2):188-210.
Epistemic Democracy with Defensible Premises.Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann - 2013 - Economics and Philosophy 29 (1):87--120.
The Persuasiveness of Democratic Majorities.Robert E. Goodin & David Estlund - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):131-142.
Epistemic Democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem.Christian List & Robert E. Goodin - 2001 - Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (3):277–306.
Voter Motivation.Adam Lovett - forthcoming - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy.
Ethical Considerations on Quadratic Voting.Ben Laurence & Itai Sher - 2017 - Public Choice 1 (172):175-192.
Compulsory Voting: For and Against.Jason Brennan & Lisa Hill - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.
Sincerity and Manipulation Under Approval Voting.Ulle Endriss - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (3):335-355.
Is Compulsory Voting Justified?Annabelle Lever - 2009 - Public Reason 1 (1):57-74.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-06-17

Total views
7 ( #1,043,403 of 2,454,646 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #98,322 of 2,454,646 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes