Hume's Theory of Business Ethics Revisited

Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):163-174 (2012)
Abstract
Hume’s examination of the conventions of property, trade, and contract addresses the moral foundations that make business possible. In this light, Hume’s theory of justice is also a foundational work in business ethics. In Hume’s analysis of these conventions, both philosophers and game theorists have correctly identified “proto” game-theoretic elements. One of the few attempts to offer a Humean theory of business ethics rests on this game-theoretic interpretation of Hume’s argument. This article argues that game-theoretic reasoning is only one part of a Humean business ethics and this can be shown by further analyzing Hume’s theory of justice. As we examine his theory, it becomes clear that Hume is not trying to show how it is always rational to respect the rules of business. Hume is not engaging in, or attempting, a reconciliation project and neither is a Humean business ethics. The final section of the article is a brief Humean analysis of the effectiveness of codes of ethics. The purpose of this section is not to decide the issue but to show how a Humean approach is both useful, relevant, and involves more than reconciling rationality and morality.
Keywords Codes of ethics  Compliance  Convention  Game theory  Hume  Humean business ethics  Justice  Reconciliation project  Self-interest  Sensible knave
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-0956-0
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 25,057
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Convention: A Philosophical Study.David Lewis - 1969 - Harvard University Press.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Looking for Answers in All the Wrong Places.Earl W. Spurgin - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2):293-313.
Hume's Game-Theoretic Business Ethics.Peter Vanderschraaf - 1999 - Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (1):47-67.
Hume and Humeans on Practical Reason.Michelle Mason - 2005 - Hume Studies 31 (2):347-378.
Humean Pleasures Reconsidered.Stephen D. Hudson - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (4):545 - 562.
Was Hume a Humean?Elijah Millgram - 1995 - Hume Studies 21 (1):75-94.
Hume's Projectivist Legacy for Environmental Ethics.Paul Haught - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (1):77-96.
Hume and Mutual Advantage.J. Salter - 2012 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (3):302-321.
Advantageous Falsehood.Wilfried K. Backhaus - 1993 - Philosophy and Theology 7 (3):289-310.
Business and Game-Playing: The False Analogy. [REVIEW]Daryl Koehn - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1447-1452.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-12-08

Total downloads

36 ( #135,583 of 2,127,006 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #100,546 of 2,127,006 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums