Three Myths of Intentionality Versus Some Medieval Philosophers


Authors
Gyula Klima
Fordham University
Abstract
This paper argues that three characteristic modern positions concerning intentionality – namely, (1) that intentionality is ‘the mark of the mental’; (2) that intentionality concerns a specific type of objects having intentional inexistence; and (3) that intentionality somehow defies logic – are just three ‘modern myths’ that medieval philosophers, from whom the modern notion supposedly originated, would definitely reject.
Keywords esse intentionale   aboutness    ampliation   appellatio rationis    information   encoding
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/09672559.2013.788266
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Aquinas on Sense-Perception.John J. Haldane - 1983 - Philosophical Review 92 (2):233-239.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
277 ( #18,876 of 2,327,894 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #19,324 of 2,327,894 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature