We should allow dissection of animals

Abstract

The focus of the paper is the ethical issues associated with the practice of dissecting animals in lower level college biology classes. Several arguments against dissection are explored. Furthermore, the issue is examined from the point of view of the instructor's academic freedom and the point of view of a student's moral autonomy. It is argued that even though the arguments against dissection fail, it is very important to respect the moral autonomy of students who oppose the practice. Often this can be accomplished in a manner that is consistent with academic freedom and good science education.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,694

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
48 (#240,026)

6 months
1 (#388,319)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

We Should Not Allow Dissection of Animals.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):181-189.

Add more references

Citations of this work

Justifying Animal Use in Education.Matt Stichter - 2012 - Environmental Ethics 34 (2):199-209.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Moral Agency in Other Animals.Paul Shapiro - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):357-373.
What Price Dissection? Dissection Literally Dissected.N. Turner - 2001 - Medical Humanities 27 (2):106-b-107.
Death, Dissection and the Destitute (Review).Sharon Thomsen - 2003 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 46 (2):312-314.
We Should Not Allow Dissection of Animals.Steve F. Sapontzis - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):181-189.