The Classical Review 10 (01):31-32 (1896)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0009840X00202990
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,946
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Note on Horace Sat. 1. 6. 126.J. Elmore - 1905 - The Classical Review 19 (08):400-401.
The Frog of Horace, Sat. 1, 3.E. S. Shuckburgh - 1901 - The Classical Review 15 (03):166-.
Nasidienus (Horace, Sat. Ii. 8).F. Haverfield - 1893 - The Classical Review 7 (08):359-.
Horace, Sat. I. 6. 104–5.W. D. Ashworth & M. Andrewes - 1957 - The Classical Review 7 (02):107-108.
A Matter of Taste in Horace ( Sat. Ii. 7. 95ff.).M. J. Mcgann - 1956 - The Classical Review 6 (02):97-99.
A Note On Juvenal Sat. 7. 86.F. Jones - 1982 - Classical Quarterly 32 (02):478-.
Note on Juvenal Sat. X. 82 Foll.W. W. Merry - 1897 - The Classical Review 11 (01):26-27.
The Ability is Not General, and Neither Are the Conclusions.Robert J. Sternberg - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):697-698.
Note on Horace, Od. Ii. 17, 29.T. Nicklin - 1898 - The Classical Review 12 (02):107-.
Note on Horace, Ep. I. 2. 31.W. C. F. Walters - 1903 - The Classical Review 17 (04):203-.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-12-06

Total views
23 ( #459,408 of 2,427,248 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #540,061 of 2,427,248 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes