On Second Thought: Reflections on the Reflection Defense

In Tania Lombrozo, Joshua Knobe & Shaun Nichols (eds.), Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, Volume 4. New York: pp. 257–296 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This chapter sheds light on a response to experimental philosophy that has not yet received enough attention: the reflection defense. According to proponents of this defense, judgments about philosophical cases are relevant only when they are the product of careful, nuanced, and conceptually rigorous reflection. The chapter argues that the reflection defense is misguided: Five studies (N>1800) are presented, showing that people make the same judgments when they are primed to engage in careful reflection as they do in the conditions standardly used by experimental philosophers.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Para‐reflections.Roy Sorensen - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (1):93-101.
Hume’s Conception of Proper Reflection.Lisa Ievers - 2012 - Hume Studies 38 (2):129-155.
The practices of the self.Charles E. Larmore - 2010 - London: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Sharon Bowman.
On Reflection.Hilary Kornblith - 2012 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
In Defense of Reflection.Simon M. Huttegger - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (3):413-433.
Global Reflection Principles.P. D. Welch - 2017 - In I. Niiniluoto, H. Leitgeb, P. Seppälä & E. Sober (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science - Proceedings of the 15th International Congress, 2015. College Publications.


Added to PP

177 (#104,094)

6 months
95 (#38,273)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Markus Kneer
University of Graz
David Colaço
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references