Three misuses of Dionysius for comparative theology: TIMOTHY D. KNEPPER

Religious Studies 45 (2):205-221 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In his 2000 Religious Studies article ‘Ineffability’, John Hick calls upon the Dionysian corpus to bear witness to the ‘transcategorality’ of God and thereby corroborate his comparative theology of pluralism. Hick's Dionysius avows God's transcendence of categories by negating God's names, while at the same time maintaining that such names are metaphorically useful means of uplifting humans to God. But herein reside three common misunderstandings of the Dionysian corpus: the divine names are mere metaphors; the divine names are therefore negated of God; and the negation of divine names is the means by which humans return to and unite with God



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Knepper.John Hick - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (2):223-226.
Not Not.Timothy D. Knepper - 2008 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (4):619-637.
Dionysius the Areopagite on Justice.Filip Ivanovic - 2013 - Studia Patristica 68:231-236.


Added to PP

5 (#1,505,296)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tim Knepper
Drake University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references