Egalitarian Justice and Valuational Judgment

Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (4):482-498 (2009)
Abstract
Contemporary discussions of egalitarian justice have often focused on the issue of expensive taste. G.A. Cohen has recently abandoned the view that all chosen disadvantages are non-compensable, now maintaining that chosen expensive judgmental tastes—those endorsed by valuational judgment—are compensable as it is unreasonable to expect persons not to develop them. But chosen expensive brute taste—the main type of non-compensable expensive taste on the new scheme—cannot be described in such a way that there is a normative difference between it and chosen expensive judgmental taste. As there are related problems with denying compensation for the other kind of expensive taste that might remain non-compensable, Cohen's position on taste appears to be either implausible or virtually indistinguishable from that of equality of welfare. However, compensation for valuational judgment-based expensive taste might be justified on grounds of responsibility.
Keywords EQUALITY   EXPENSIVE TASTE   RESPONSIBILITY   G.A. COHEN   CHOICE   JUSTICE
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/174046809X12464327133177
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Luck Egalitarianism.Carl Knight - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (10):924-934.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Kant's Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's Theory of Taste".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2003 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):143 – 163.
Acquired Taste.Kevin Melchionne - 2007 - Contemporary Aesthetics.
Expensive Taste Rides Again.G. A. Cohen - 2004 - In Ronald Dworkin & Justine Burley (eds.), Dworkin and His Critics: With Replies by Dworkin. Blackwell.
The Subjective Basis of Kant's Judgment of Taste.Brian Watkins - 2011 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 54 (4):315-336.
Eine andere Art von Gefühl der Lust beim Kantischen Geschmacksurteil.Hye-Jin Lee - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:283-291.
Are Kant's “Aesthetic Judgment” and “Judgment of Taste” Synonymous?Theodore A. Gracyk - 1990 - International Philosophical Quarterly 30 (2):159-172.
Kant and the Pleasure of “Mere Reflection”.Melissa Zinkin - 2012 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (5):433-453.
Taste, Gastronomic Expertise and Objectivity.Michael J. Shaffer - 2007 - In Fritz Allhoff & David Monroe (eds.), Food & Philosophy. Blackwell.
Expensive Tastes and Distributive Justice.Simon Keller - 2002 - Social Theory and Practice 28 (4):529-552.
Delicacy in Hume's Theory of Taste.Theodore Gracyk - 2011 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):1-16.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-14

Total downloads

163 ( #28,835 of 2,178,129 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

24 ( #13,367 of 2,178,129 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums