Religious Studies 42 (2):213-223 (2006)
In this paper I argue that the denial of middle knowledge and emphasis on human freedom characteristic of open theism makes the traditional concept of hell even more morally problematic than it would otherwise be. But these same features of open theism present serious difficulties for the view that all will necessarily be saved. I conclude by arguing that the most promising approach for open theists is to adopt a version of contingent, as opposed to necessary, universalism. (Published Online April 7 2006).
|Keywords||Universalism Hell Open theism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Comment on William Hasker's “The Goodness of the Creator: An Open Theist Perspective”.Lynne Rudder Baker - manuscript
The Religious Adequacy of Free-Will Theism.David M. Ciocchi - 2002 - Religious Studies 38 (1):45-61.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #124,996 of 2,178,151 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,021 of 2,178,151 )
How can I increase my downloads?