Unit-ideas Unleashed: A Reinterpretation and Reassessment of Lovejovian Methodology in the History of Ideas
Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (2):195-217 (2012)
This article argues for an unconventional interpretation of Arthur O. Lovejoy’s distinctive approach to method in the history of ideas. It is maintained that the value of the central concept of the ‘unit-idea’ has been misunderstood by friends and foes alike. The commonality of unit-ideas at different times and places is often defined in terms of familial resemblance. But such an approach must necessarily define unit-ideas as being something other than the smallest conceptual unit. It is therefore in tension with Lovejoy’s methodological prescription and, more importantly, disregards a potentially important aspect of intellectual history – the smaller conceptual units themselves. In response to this, an alternative interpretation of unit-ideas as ‘elemental’ – as the smallest identifiable conceptual components – is put forward. Unlike the familial resemblance approach, the elemental approach can provide a plausible explanation for changes in ideas. These are construed as being either the creation of new unit-ideas, the disappearance of existing ones, or alterations in the groups of unit-ideas that compose idea-complexes. The focus on the movement of unit-ideas and idea-complexes through history can also be sensitive to contextual issues, carefully distinguishing the different meanings that single words may have, in much the way that both Lovejoy and his influential critic Quentin Skinner suggest.
|Keywords||Quentin Skinner causality context Arthur O. Lovejoy change|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Modelling the History of Ideas.Arianna Betti & Hein van den Berg - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (4):812-835.
Similar books and articles
Rationality and the Unit of Action.Christopher Woodard - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (2):261-277.
The Concept of Unit Coherence and Its Application to Psychology Theories.David Trafimow - 2012 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (2):131-154.
Conceptual History and the Philosophy of the Later Wittgenstein: A Critique of Quentin Skinners Contextualist Method.Tony Burns - 2011 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (1):54-83.
Lovejoy's Readings of Bruno: Or How Nineteenth-Century History of Philosophy Was "Transformed" Into the History of Ideas.Leo Catana - 2009 - Journal of the History of Ideas 71 (1):91-112.
The Discovery of Time: Third Volume in Series The Ancestry of Science (Nuffield Foundation Unit for the History of Ideas). By Stephen Toulmin and June Goodfield. (Hutchinson, London. 1965. Pp. 280. 35s.). [REVIEW]H. V. Stopes-Roe - 1967 - Philosophy 42 (161):282-.
The Problem of "Misplaced Ideas" Revisited: Beyond the "History of Ideas" in Latin America.Eleas Jose Palti - 2006 - Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (1):149-179.
Theoretical Proposal of Hybrid Analysis of Lexical Unit: Light.Robert Boroch - 2012 - In Edis - Publishing Institution of the University Of Zilina (ed.), Proceedings in Advanced Research in Scientific Areas. The 1st Virtual International Conference.
History as Re-Enactment: R.G. Collingwood's Idea of History.H. Dray William - 1995 - Oxford University Press.
Ideas Are Not Replicators but Minds Are.Liane Gabora - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 19 (1):127-143.
The Limits of Individualism Are Not the Limits of Rationality.Susan Hurley - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):164-165.
Innate Ideas Without Abstract Ideas: An Essay on Berkeley's Platonism.John Russell Roberts - manuscript
Added to index2012-09-10
Total downloads367 ( #7,356 of 2,169,749 )
Recent downloads (6 months)71 ( #2,436 of 2,169,749 )
How can I increase my downloads?