Welfare Economics and the Welfare State in Historical Perspective


Authors
Karen Knight
University of Western Australia
Abstract
Although the economic thought of Marshall and Pigou was united by ethical positions broadly considered utilitarian, differences in their intellectual milieu led to degrees of difference between their respective philosophical visions. This change in milieu includes the influence of the little understood period of transition from the early idealist period in Great Britain, which provided the context to Marshall’s intellectual formation, and the late British Idealist period, which provided the context to Pigou’s intellectual formation. During this latter period, the pervading Hegelianism and influences of naturalism arising from the ideas of Charles Darwin and Herbert Spencer were challenged by Hermann Lotze, a key transitional thinker influencing the Neo-Kantian movement, who recognised significant limits of naturalism, on the one hand, and the metaphysical tenor of absolute idealism, on the other, and attempted to provide a balance between the two. The goal of this paper is to make the provisional case for the argument that Pigou’s views on ethics were not only directly influenced by utilitarian thinkers like Mill and Sidgwick, but they were also indirectly influenced by Hermann Lotze, via the influence of the Neo- Kantian movement on late British idealism. To that end, Pigou’s essays in The Trouble with Theism (1908), including his sympathetic consideration of the ethics of Friedrich Nietzsche, reflect the influence of Lotze indirectly through the impact at Cambridge of: James Ward’s critique of associationist psychology, and consideration of the limits of naturalism including the critique of evolutionary ethics; Bertrand Russell’s rejection of neo-Hegelianism and, together with Alfred North Whitehead, the development of Logicism; and G.E. Moore’s critique of utilitarian ethics on the basis of the naturalistic fallacy and the development of his own intuitionist system of ethics.
Keywords Welfare  Pigou  Sidgwick
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Leviathan.Thomas Hobbes - 2006 - In Aloysius Martinich, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
Principia Ethica.Evander Bradley McGilvary & George Edward Moore - 1904 - Philosophical Review 13 (3):351.

View all 69 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Some Aspects of the Welfare State.A. C. Pigou - 1954 - Diogenes 2 (7):1-11.
Welfare Pluralism: Welfare Provision Transformation from State to Multi-sectors.Hua-min Peng & Ye-Qing Huang - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 6:40-48.
Death is a Welfare Issue.James W. Yeates - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):229-241.
Sufficiency and Population Ethics.Robert Huseby - 2012 - Ethical Perspectives 19 (2):187-206.
Overcoming False Dichotomies: Mill, Marx and the Welfare State.P. Lindsay - 2000 - History of Political Thought 21 (4):657-681.
Democracy and the Welfare State.Amy Gutmann (ed.) - 1988 - Princeton University Press.
Animal Welfare: Ends and Means.Roger Cryan - 1997 - Dissertation, University of Florida
Welfare Incentives and Taxation.James A. Mirrlees - 2006 - Oxford University Press UK.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-01-19

Total views
272 ( #22,999 of 2,271,448 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #35,831 of 2,271,448 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature