What are definitions of life good for? Transdisciplinary and other definitions in astrobiology

Biology and Philosophy 32 (6):1185-1203 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The attempt to define life has gained new momentum in the wake of novel fields such as synthetic biology, astrobiology, and artificial life. In a series of articles, Cleland, Chyba, and Machery claim that definitions of life seek to provide necessary and sufficient conditions for applying the concept of life—something that such definitions cannot, and should not do. We argue that this criticism is largely unwarranted. Cleland, Chyba, and Machery approach definitions of life as classifying devices, thereby neglecting their other epistemic roles. We identify within the discussions of the nature and origin of life three other types of definitions: theoretical, transdisciplinary, and diagnostic definitions. The primary aim of these definitions is not to distinguish life from nonlife, although they can also be used for classificatory purposes. We focus on the definitions of life within the budding field of astrobiology, paying particular attention to transdisciplinary definitions, and diagnostic definitions in the search for biosignatures from other planets.

Similar books and articles

On what it is to fly can tell us something about what it is to live.Christophe Malaterre - 2010 - Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 40 (2):169-177.
Defining Philosophical Counselling: An Overview1.D. Louw - 2013 - South African Journal of Philosophy 32 (1):60-70.
Pornographic Art - A Case from Definitions.Simon Fokt - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (3):287-300.
Life without definitions.Carol E. Cleland - 2012 - Synthese 185 (1):125-144.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-02

Downloads
390 (#46,538)

6 months
129 (#22,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Andrea Loettgers
University of Vienna
Tarja Knuuttila
University of Vienna