Prajñākaragupta on the Two Truths and Argumentation

Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):427-439 (2011)
How is it possible to say that truth can be of one kind at the conventional level and totally different in the ultimate plane? As Matilal ( 1971 , p. 154) points out, Kumārila (ca. 600–650), a Mīmāṃsaka philosopher, claims that the Buddhist doctrine of two truths is “a kind of philosophical ‘double-talk’.” It is Prajñākaragupta (ca. 750–810), a Buddhist logician, who tries to give a direct answer to this question posed by Kumārila from the Buddhist side. He argues that even a Mīmāṃsaka cannot demonstrate the validity ( prāmāṇya ) of the Veda without accepting two truth levels. His point is this. Consider the proposition to be proved: the Veda is valid. If the Veda is already known as valid, then it is useless to prove this proposition. But if it is already known as invalid, then it is impossible to prove this proposition. Therefore in the argument to prove the proposition, the Veda is not to be regarded either as valid or as invalid. This means that at the first stage of the argument one has the concept of the Veda as neutral in validity. However, as soon as one acquires the knowledge of the Veda as valid through the argument, one has to repudiate such a conception of the Veda. The acceptance of the Veda as neutral in validity is to the acceptance of the Veda as valid as the conventional truth is to the ultimate truth
Keywords Buddhist epistemology  Two truths  Prajñākaragupta  Kumārila   Veda
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10781-011-9140-1
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,215
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Note on Formality and Logical Consequence.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (5):529-539.
“Will This Potato Grow?”.Guy Newland - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:61-72.
Imagery.Veda Cobb-Stevens - 1986 - International Philosophical Quarterly 26 (1):87-91.
Semiotics.Veda Cobb-Stevens - 1988 - International Philosophical Quarterly 28 (2):235-236.
The Status of the Veda in the Two Mimansas.Michel Hulin - 2009 - In M. T. Stepani͡ant͡s (ed.), Knowledge and Belief in the Dialogue of Cultures. Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Hume and Husserl.Veda Cobb-Stevens - 1981 - International Philosophical Quarterly 21 (2):223-225.
Moral Action.Veda Cobb-Stevens - 1988 - International Philosophical Quarterly 28 (2):236-239.
Myth, Symbol, and Reality.Veda Cobb-Stevens - 1982 - International Philosophical Quarterly 22 (2):216-218.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

11 ( #400,818 of 2,164,580 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #347,948 of 2,164,580 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums