Polis 19 (1-2):29-43 (2002)

Abstract
Maistre's Soirees de Saint-Petersbourg is modeled on Plato's Laws. Plato and Maistre both demand the political control of natural inquiry, and implement these controls through theodictic conversation. Maistre, following the lead of Plato's legislator, publishes an exemplary conversation about providence between a young man tempted by an atheistic Enlightenment and two older, wiser, and more learned men of affairs. Maistre defends providentialism from materialist interpretations of natural science even as Plato defended it from ancient materialism
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/20512996-019-01-90000005
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,339
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rousseau, Maistre, and the Counter-Enlightenment.G. Garrard - 1994 - History of Political Thought 15 (1):97-120.
El problema de la teodicea en el pensamiento de Joseph de Maistre.Gabriel Ernesto Andrade - 2006 - 'Ilu. Revista de Ciencias de Las Religiones 11:71-92.
Joseph de Maistre y la Constitución imposible.Erik Del Búfalo - 2009 - Foro Interno. Anuario de Teoría Política 9:65-85.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-01

Total views
1 ( #1,500,451 of 2,448,775 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #445,251 of 2,448,775 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes