AI and Society 20 (2):125-137 (2005)
We have developed a broadcasting agent system, public opinion channel (POC) caster, which generates understandable conversational form from text-based documents. The POC caster circulates the opinions of community members by using conversational form in a broadcasting system on the Internet. We evaluated its transformation rules in two experiments. In experiment 1, we examined our transformation rules for conversational form in relation to sentence length. Twenty-four participants listened to two types of sentence (long sentences and short sentences) with conversational form or with single speech. In experiment 2, we investigated the relationship between conversational form and the userâs knowledge level. Forty-two participants (21 with a high knowledge level and 21 with a low knowledge level) were selected for a knowledge task and listened to two kinds of sentence (sentences about a well-known topic or sentences about an unfamiliar topic). Our results indicate that the conversational form aided comprehension, especially for long sentences and when users had little knowledge about the topic. We explore possible explanations and implications of these results with regard to human cognition and text comprehension
|Keywords||Agents Information providing Conversational form Comprehension Evaluative study|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rationality and Conversation: A Thesis on Grice's Theory of Conversation.Matthew D. Schoolfield - unknown
Conversational Exercitives: Something Else We Do with Our Words. [REVIEW]Mary Kate Mcgowan - 2004 - Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (1):93-111.
Some Steps Towards a General Theory of Relevance.L. Jonathan Cohen - 1994 - Synthese 101 (2):171 - 185.
Imaginative Resistance and Conversational Implicature.Bence Nanay - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):586-600.
Lexical Misunderstandings and Prototype Theory.Rebecca Clift - 1998 - AI and Society 12 (3):109-133.
Conversational Implicatures (and How to Spot Them).Michael Blome-Tillmann - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (2):170-185.
Conversational Scorekeeping and Conditionals.Donald Nute - 1980 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 9 (2):153 - 166.
The Passover Haggadah as Argument, Or Why Is This Text Different From Other Texts?Alan Zemel - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (1):57-77.
Crafting the Illusion of Meaning: Template-Based Speciﬁcation of Embodied Conversational Behavior.Matthew Stone - unknown
Conversational Implicatures Are Still Cancellable.Roberta Colonna Dahlman - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (3):321-327.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads20 ( #244,741 of 2,158,136 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #87,457 of 2,158,136 )
How can I increase my downloads?