Response: The Compatibility of Evolution and Design

Zygon 57 (4):1108-1123 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Denis Alexander, David Glass, Peter Jeavons, Meghan Page, Bethany Sollereder, and Mats Wahlberg have offered interpretations, critique, and defenses of E. V. R. Kojonen's book The Compatibility of Evolution and Design. Here, Kojonen responds to their comments on wideranging issues related to the teleology and evolution, from models of God as Creator to the meaning of randomness and design.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/zygo.12845

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Compatibility of Evolution and Design.E. V. R. Kojonen - 2021 - Springer Verlag.
The Compatibility of Evolution and Design, E. V. R. Kojonen.Robert A. Larmer - 2022 - Philosophia Christi 24 (1):163-168.
Metaphysics and Evolution: A Response to Dennis F. Polis.Michał Chaberek - 2021 - Studia Gilsoniana 10 (1):45–69.
The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design.Peter Jeavons - 2022 - Zygon 57 (4):1051-1068.
S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.Richard J. Wallace - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (3):354.
Certain Uncertainties and the Design of Design Education.Johan Redström - 2020 - She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 6 (1):83-100.
The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium.Zachary Ardern - 2022 - Zygon 57 (4):1019-1023.
Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence.J. Richard Simon, James V. Hinrichs & John L. Craft - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):97.
The Theory of Evolution in the Writings of Joseph Ratzinger.Francisco J. Novo - 2020 - Scientia et Fides 8 (2):323-349.
Is it Really so Easy to Model Biological Evolution in Terms of Design-free Cumulative Selection?Peter Punin - manuscript
Does criticizing intelligent design (id) undermine design discourse in the qurʾān? A kalāmic response.Shoaib Ahmed Malik, Hamza Karamali & Moamer Yahia Ali Khalayleh - 2022 - Zygon 57 (2):490-513.
Design and sociocultural evolution: Theoretical and practical considerations.John Broadbent - 2002 - World Futures 58 (2 & 3):213 – 228.
Design Discourse: A Way Forward for Theistic Evolutionism?Erkki Vesa Rope Kojonen - 2018 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 60 (3):435-451.
Sober on Intelligent Design. [REVIEW]Sahotra Sarkar - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):683-691.
What and whose values in design?Anne Gerdes - 2014 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 12 (1):18-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-13

Downloads
15 (#919,495)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Design Argument in Classical Hindu Thought.C. Mackenzie Brown - 2008 - International Journal of Hindu Studies 12 (2):103-151.
St. Thomas Aquinas on Intelligent Design.Robert C. Koons & Logan Paul Gage - 2011 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:79-97.

View all 6 references / Add more references