Human Rights and Assigned Duties: Implications for Corporations [Book Review]

Human Rights Review 10 (4):569-582 (2008)

Abstract

Human rights imply duties. The question is, duties for whom? Without a well-defined scheme for assigning duties correlative to human rights, these rights remain illusory. This paper develops core elements of a general scheme of duty assignment and studies the implications for corporations. A key distinction in such an assignment is between unconditional and conditional duties. Unconditional duties apply to every agent regardless of the conduct of others. Conditional duties reflect a division of moral labour where different tasks are assigned to specific agents, whose default activates back-up duties of other agents. Corporations face unconditional duties to not directly violate the rights of others, and not undermine the division of moral labour through practices such as tax evasion or corruption. Being unconditional, these duties cannot be deviated from by reference to the misconduct of competitors. In addition, corporate conditional duties to protect, promote or fulfil rights can be activated if the state and other designated duty-bearers fail to discharge their duties

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,660

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-04

Downloads
41 (#280,616)

6 months
4 (#163,468)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

References found in this work

Elements of a Theory of Human Rights.S. E. N. Amartya - 2004 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (4):315–356.
Agents of Justice.Onora O'Neill - 2001 - Metaphilosophy 32 (1-2):180-195.
Mediating Duties.Henry Shue - 1988 - Ethics 98 (4):687-704.

View all 7 references / Add more references