Moral Conduct Under Conditions of Moral Imperfection

Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 2:93-112 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Shakespeare’s Hamlet best illustrates the problem with which a thoughtful and morally motivated person is confronted if crime, dishonesty and betrayal flourish in his or her social surroundings. The Danish prince finds himself in a genuine moral dilemma upon learning that his father, the former king, died not of natural causes but was insidiously murdered by his own brother, Hamlet’s uncle, Claudius, who now reigns over Denmark and shares the bed of the victim’s widow, Hamlet’s mother. Hamlet vacillates for some time about what he ought to do. Finally, not without hesitancy and reluctance, he resolves to take revenge. To conceal his intentions, he acts as if he were crazy, astonishing the royal court with his altogether strange behavior. By doing so, however, he provokes the mistrust of King Claudius all the more. Claudius employs the Lord Chamberlain, Polonius, to whose daughter Ophelia Hamlet finds himself attracted, and two friends from Hamlet’s youth, Rosencrantz and Guildenstem, to spy on him. Acting on his emotions, Hamlet kills Polonius, an unprincipled and foolish schemer. This gives Claudius a welcome opportunity to get rid of Hamlet by banishing him, guarded by Rosencrantz and Guildenstem, to England, with the intention of having him murdered there . Yet Hamlet has become suspicious. In the luggage of his companions he finds the king’s letter with the order for his murder, and he replaces it with another, instructing those to whom it is addressed to kill Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. He himself succeeds in escaping and returns to the Danish royal court. There he runs into Laertes, the son of Polonius and brother of Ophelia . Laertes, who cannot wait to take revenge for the deaths of his father and sister, becomes entangled by Claudius in a disgraceful attempt on Hamlet’s life. They persuade Hamlet into agreeing to a fencing match, not knowing that, whatever the outcome, he will die. For Laertes fences with a poisoned blade, and Claudius has a poisonous drink for Hamlet in reserve. The tragic end of the story is well known

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Foreword to the German Edition of Lilian Winstanley's Hamlet and the Scottish Succession.Carl Schmitt - 2010 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2010 (153):164-177.
Mother and Son.John Decarlo - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 6 (14):51-60.
Allegories of Falling.Howard Eiland - 2011 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2011 (155):175-190.
Steward of the Dying Voice: The Intrusion of Horatio into Sovereignty and Representation.Timothy Wong - 2010 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2010 (153):113-131.
Myth or Knowledge? Reading Carl Schmitt's Hamlet or Hecuba.Carsten Strathausen - 2010 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2010 (153):7-29.
Hegel and Shakespeare on Moral Imagination.Jennifer Ann Bates - 2010 - State University of New York Press.
Hamlet and the Philosophy of Literary Criticism.Morris Weitz - 1964 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Time Out of Joint: Hamlet and the Pure Form of Time.Henry Somers-Hall - 2011 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 5 (Suppl):56-76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
22 (#666,248)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Koller
University of Graz

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references